Fixation Final Version (With Edited Typography)

The typography used for the titles in our previous version of the opening did not seem to blend well with the piece of film itself.
   Although we tried to choose colours that mixed well with others in the shot, the writing itself I feel did not stand out too well and there was a lack of consistency throughout.
   We chose a font that seemed to express the sharp, harmful ways of the stalker and the use of his computer by making it solid and plain, trying to resemble the print of a keyboard or typewriter. The solidarity of it was also used to hint at the logical mind of the stalker and the ways in which he performs his tasks.
   However, the titles still seemed out of place as they stood still against the more shaky, unnerving footage, and seemed to lack personality.
   I decided to create new titles for the piece using LiveType. My aim was to improve the faults that I have already mentioned and make the titles work much better with the piece as a whole.
   To keep a consistency with colours, I used a range of golds so that they would match well with the golds on the clock in the initial shot and with the walls in the others. Because I did not use one solid colour, it made the titles more interesting and less stark against the footage. This factor also helped the titles to stand out against their background where they hadn’t before (such as ‘and Karl Fricker as’ being a dark font blended into the dark background).

   Rather than choosing a very plain font, I decided to use the same one that I had when adding the title to the stalker's book: My Underwood (http://www.fontspace.com/tension-type/my-underwood). This typewriter font I feel portrays the use of the computer more clearly and in a more interesting fashion. A simple font like the one previously used can be drawn on in many situations, our thoughts of such a font are not just confined to a computer but possibly a book, poster or many other forms of publication.
   Also, instead of suggesting the stalkers logical thinking, it takes a different approach and depicts the jumpy eeriness of the situation along with the font’s movement, which I feel relates clearer to the thriller genre. It could also illustrate the disturbing thoughts and ways of the stalker.
   The shaky, unstable movement of the font works much better with the footage compared to the previously very still titles. I feel that it adds more character to the piece and makes it more visually interesting as before it was rather dull.
   I also feel that the movement of the font, and the fact that the whole phrase is not shown right away, keeps the audience focused and adds to the sense of mystery which a thriller should portray.
   By ending the titles with the last one fading away as I am about to walk into it, I feel that the titles ending is much more precise and clear compared to the previous version where you were unsure as whether there were more to come.

Marketing and Distribution

1. What is vertical distribution?
Vertical distribution/integration is the process in which several steps in the production and/or distribution of a product or service are controlled by a single company or entity, in order to increase that company’s or entity’s power in the marketplace.

Simply said, every single product that you can think of has a big life cycle. While you might recognize the product with the Brand name printed on it, many companies are involved in developing that product. These companies are necessarily not part of the brand you see.

2. How does this affect control of the film industry?
It means that the film industry is highly controlled by a very limited number of people who control what films are distributed. This makes it difficult for smaller film producers to create and distribute films and our choice of film becomes very narrow and specific as it is only coming from these few producers.

3.How does a recent disney film benefit from this?
As disney is one of the main big media companies, they can use all of their owned forms of media such as various TV and radio shows to promote their upcoming film.

4. Which media companies do general electric own?A minority share in television networks NBC and Telemundo, Universal Pictures, Focus Features, 26 television stations in the United States and cable networks MSNBC, Bravo and the Sci Fi Channel. GE also owns 80 percent of NBC Universal.

5. What manufacturing facility do they own which supports the vertical distribution system?
Universal Studios home entertainment

6. Look back at the previous two answers. How then do companies owned by General Electric benfit from their vertical distribution system?
As they are all linked, they can work together to share various ways of distributing their media and help to promote each other.

7.Compared to the production cost of a film, how much does marketing and distribution cost?
25-30% of the entire film budget is spent on marketing

8.Who do Working Title primarily market their films towards?
Working Title have developed a wide range of films with varying genres ranging from comedies such as hot fuzz to more deeply thoughtful, romantic, meaningful films like atonement. Obviously each genre will be aimed at audiences interested in that style of film, but Working Title have said that they aim their films at audiences that are interested in the story behind the film apposed to those who are interested in action packed films with special effects for example.

9. Vertical distribution systems should guarentee a film's success. Find a Working Title film that did not perform as well as expected. What factors, other than distribution and marketing, caused this film to be a commercial failure?
The Boat That Rocked -The film opened 1 April 2009 and was a commercial failure at the British box office, making only GB£6.1 million in its first twelve weeks, less than a quarter of its over £30 million production cost. It received mixed reviews, with most criticism directed at its muddled storyline and 2¼-hour length. For its North American release it was re-edited to trim its running time by twenty minutes, and retitled Pirate Radio. Opening 13 November 2009, Pirate Radio was still commercially unsuccessful, earning only about US$8 million (approximately £5 million).

10. Smaller companies cannot benefit from a vertical distribution system. What marketing methods do independant or small film studios use instead?
Using the internet to spread news of their niche films that will appeal to specific audiences that will be searching for them.

Lighting

High-key lighting
A lighting approach that avoids contrast between light and dark areas of a shot usually with a prominent fill light.

Low-key lighting

Lighting that puts most of the set in shadow and uses just a few highlights to define the subject.

Backlighting

This is the process of illuminating the subject from the back. In other words, the lighting instrument and the viewer are facing towards each other, with the subject in between. This causes the edges of the subject to glow, while the other areas remain darker.

Fill light
Illumination added to reduce shadows or contrast range.

Chiaroscuro lighting
Lighting which creates strong contrasts between light and dark.

Rim lighting

Occurs when the main light is placed behind the subject so that the subject’s face is completely in shadow, but there is a rim of light around the subject’s head, like the corona in a full eclipse.

Skins representation of disability - Series 2, Episode 1, Church Scene

   We are initially shown the inside of a church, with the only light coming from the stain glassed windows. The mass of dark in the shot and the solemn religious music that is playing suggests a funeral. Knowing that at the end of the last series the main character Tony was hit by a bus, we fear that he has died and we are about to witness his funeral.
   The religious music then brakes to a very heavy bass dance style song, and we see one of the main characters - Maxxie appear. We then soon realize that it is a dance recital and not a funeral.
   Although I feel that the main purpose of this beginning

Working Title Films

   Working Title Films was co-founded by producers Tim Bevan and Sarah Radclyffe in 1983. In 1992, PolyGram became the company's corporate backer. Radclyffe left Working Title, and Eric Fellner, a fellow independent film producer, joined the company. The company produced a variety of films for PolyGram's London-based production company PolyGram Filmed Entertainment. An Anglo-Dutch film studio, PolyGram Films became a major Hollywood competitor. In 1999, PolyGram was sold to Seagram and merged with MCA Music Entertainment, to form Universal Music Group. PolyGram Films was merged and sold to Universal Studios in 1999.
Although contractually allowed to produce any film with a budget of up to $35 million, on a practical basis, Bevan and Fellner consult with studio executive at Working Title's parent company NBCUniversal. Working Title is located in London, and is known for having a limited number of employees. The company also has other offices located in Los Angeles, and Ireland.
   Working Title Television is a joint venture with NBCUniversal and will be based in London and Los Angeles. NBCUniversal is Working Title's parent company.

Atonement Digital Fact-File

Storyline
When Briony Tallis, 13 years old and an aspiring writer, sees her older sister Cecilia and Robbie Turner at the fountain in front of the family estate she misinterprets what is happening thus setting into motion a series of misunderstandings and a childish pique that will have lasting repercussions for all of them. Robbie is the son of a family servant toward whom the family has always been kind. They paid for his time at Cambridge and now he plans on going to medical school. After the fountain incident, Briony reads a letter intended for Cecilia and concludes that Robbie is a deviant. When her cousin Lola is raped, she tells the police that it was Robbie she saw committing the deed.

Stars
Keira Knightly as Cecilia Tallis
James McAvoy as Robbie Turner
Saoirse Ronan as Briony Tallis age 13
Director: Joe Wright
Writers: Ian McEwan (novel), Christopher Hampton (screenplay)
Box Office
Release Date:7 September 2007 (UK)
Budget:$30,000,000 (estimated)
Opening Weekend:£1,634,065 (UK) (9 September 2007) (411 Screens)
Gross:$129,266,061 (Worldwide) (1 February 2009)

Awards
Atonement has been named among the Top 10 Films of 2007 by the Austin Film Critics Association, the Dallas-Fort Worth Film Critics Association, the National Board of Review, New York Film Critics Online, the Oklahoma Film Critics Circle, and the Southeastern Film Critics Association.

Reviewsby chelseachelsea 20 August 2007
Great interpretation of a wonderful novel
I saw a preview of this film yesterday and felt privileged to be one of the first people to see the film. It was also a pleasure to see a film before reading any other critical review or opinion. I am a great fan of Ian Mcewan and was concerned that it would not be possible to capture the subtleties and nuances of Mcewan's writing but I needn't have had any worries. The director, Joe Wright and screenplay writer Christopher Hampton have done a superb job and the complexities of the novel are superbly captured with real imagination. The story is set in three main areas, an English country house in 1935, war torn France 1940 and London 1940. The atmosphere in of all three are wonderfully captured by the director, cinematographer, costume design and score and I am sure that there are going to be some Oscar nominations for these. James McAvoy as lead man gives a tremendous performance of a restrained but passionate man. I was not as convinced by Keira Knightley's performance and am not sure that her acting has the mature edge to capture the social nuances of the times that McAvoy did so successfully. Do not see this film if you like fast paced films and rapid plot development! This is not a film for the pop video generation. If however you like character development and a plot that unravels at a pace that allows you to be immersed in the atmosphere of the film then I can highly recommend Atonement as one of the best films that I have seen this year.



Author: Simon Parker from United Kingdom
If this doesn't win Best Picture next year it will have been robbed!, 10 September 2007
   Its very rare that a movie like Atonement comes along and leaves me completely speechless and in complete and utter awe for hours after I have seen it. You see Atonement isn't just the best movie I have seen all year, its one of the best movies I have seen in a very, very long time. And by that I include Pan's Labyrinth, yes this movie is better than my favourite movie of 2006, and I never imagined Atonement would ever come close to that level of greatness until fifteen minutes into the movie last night. Atonement is an unusual movie, in fact its fair to say that I have never seen anything quite like it. Its a rare movie that actually I adored so much that I am going to hunt down a copy of the book tomorrow just to see the comparisons. Its not an easy movie I'll be honest, if you go in expecting something light hearted and easy to digest then you will leave the cinema feeling very cheated. This is a movie that deals with very dark things at times. No matter how much I desire to write in depth about every aspect of the movie I just can't, the movies greatest triumph is the fact that its plot is so intricately woven that if you ruin one part of the storyline to anyone then the movies impact is slightly lessened. The storyline is just brilliant, but its the climax that leaves you in store for the biggest shocker, and its this shocker that leaves you reeling long after you have left the cinema. The performances here are all spectacular, I think its fair to say that the two leads, James McAvoy and Keira Knightly shall be receiving at the very least nominations for Best Actor/Best Actress. The score is beautiful, whoever came up with the idea of using a typewriter as a musical instrument deserves to be praised heavily. Its rare a score leaves me feeling moved, the score in this movie did that for me. That's yet another Oscar that this movie deserves to win. All in all Atonement is just perfection, I doubt you'll find a better movie this year or even for the next three years. In a time when Blockbusters get all the attention it is nice to see a small, but intelligent movie leave me in awe.
   As I previously mentioned the performances in this movie is simply amazing. Keira Knightly is an odd actress, while she proved herself in Pride and Prejudice, yes I have unfortunately seen that movie, she comes across as a wooden actress in films like Pirates of the Caribbean. Atonement really sees her at her best yet. Her character is different from what we've seen Knightly play before. Usually she goes for the spunky females, this time she seems more like a proper lady, albeit one that smokes constantly and is a bit stuck up for her own good. Keira Knightly excels in the earlier, more laid back sequences, but its in the later stuff, the more powerful stuff that we see just how talented an actress she truly is. Despite all my praise for Knightly she still plays second fiddle to James McAvoy. The former actor of Shameless and Narnia is on a roll lately. His excellent, although sadly overlooked performance in The Last King of Scotland still sticks firmly in memory. But his performance here is simple breathtaking. One sequence in particular where we see his acting talent come to light has to be the sequence in Dunkirk (more on that later), no words but the performance says everything. Knightly might not be certain to win an Oscar, but McAvoy surely is! Its also refreshing to see a young actress, Saoirse Ronan, not be eye gougingly irritating, but rather a superb actress. Her character, Briony, is a vital character in the movie, and for such a young actress she delivers her performance so chillingly brilliant. Unfortunately next to this brilliant performance, Romola Garai who plays an older Briony pales in comparison. Her performance is still brilliant, but not as effective nor as memorable as the younger actress.
   The storyline of Atonement is where the film holds most of its impact. Essentialy the film is about a lie that Briony tells, and how it affects the lives of her, Cecilia, and most importantly of all, Robbie. That's pretty much all I can and will say of the storyline. A lot more happens over the course of the movie, and a lot of stuff that you think will happen doesn't, and things you think won't happen will. The ending is a prime example of this and to be honest I didn't see it coming. The way the movie is directed is also something note. The beautiful colours of the summer house are amazing, but the way the camera moves around the house makes it even better. But the direction will be remembered for one scene in this movie, and its in Dunkirk. I mentioned this previously for the performance in that scene, what I failed to mention is that the shot is a continuous shot that lasts five minutes as we see the chaos of Dunkirk. From horses being shot to a man hanging from a ferris wheel, the sequence is shown in all its glory. It really is a powerful moment, and probably the one scene that got me closest to tears, purely because of the singing in the background, it is shocking just how amazing this sequence truly is.
   Overall Atonement is a perfect movie, in actual fact its a movie with pretty much no flaws whatsoever. Superb performances, beautiful direction, a script and storyline to die for. It is unlikely any film will top this for a very long time, this is something that will go down in cinema history as being a classic, and it highly deserves it inevitable status.

Improvements to make after first practice exam question

   After doing my first practice exam question based on an extract from Doctor Who and looking at other answer examples along with the mark scheme, these are some things which I feel I could improve upon with my next answer:

   Reference to the points that I am talking about - Although I talked about props and mise-en-scene etc, I did not reference the fact that I was talking about these things which I will need to do in the future.

   More reference to sound and editing - I feel that my points on gender based on mise-en-scene and camera shots were fairly good, but I could have written more about sound and editing used. However, we did not have the full exam time to complete this question and I was starting to explain these things but ran out of time.

   Precise comments - I managed to get a fair amount of information down, but I am not sure that everything was relevant and was needed in as much detail. Also, I did not get round to properly answering the question but instead wrote many detailed notes. Next time I should probably focus on the major ways in which each aspect is used to represent the chosen topic (in this case gender), write brief notes about these and then write precise answers out in full, rather than rambling about absolutely everything that I could possibly analyze.

How does the 'Skins' trailer represent teenagers?

Sound
The song used throughout the trailer is 'Standing In The Way of Control by Gossip'. The lyrics themselves describe the way in which these teenagers will rebell against anyone who stands in their way, hinting to a stereotypical view of a teenager who does what they want and has little respect for others. The lyrics even explain feelings teens are likely to have in a party situation like this where you're 'forgetting who you are', doing stupid things because you can't think properly due to drugs and alchohol, and although what you've done seems stupid afterwards, you're young and carefree so 'you do it all again'.
The music has a faced paced bassline which mirrors the fast cuts between scenes and the actions of the teenagers.

Editing
There are 78 cuts between scenes in this 60 seconds of footage! The high amount of cuts help to give the trailer a greater sense of pace, excitement and help to generally keep you focused on what's happening - there is no time to get bored and look away, there are always several things going on at one time and you are fixated on it whether you are interested in the programme or not, the way in which it only gives you a second or less to figure out what is going on in each shot means that it has your undivided attention due to the fact that being human we want to know what is going on.
The pace is a factor which contibutes to displaying the teenagers as wild, unruly, loud, dangerous, violent, unthoughtful and out of control.
I think that the fast pace could also be suggesting the quick thinking of the teenaers minds or actions due to drugs.

Camera shots
The way in which the camera shots are quick and diorientated, without a proffessional controlled quality makes it seem as if it has been filmed using a hand-held camera by someone at the party. As we view it through the eyes of someone at the party and get quite detailed shots of everything that is going on, we as the audience feel personally involved and as if we are actually there. This increases our desirability to be there at the party and in turn watch the show to continue the excitement.

Mise-en-scene

Lighting: is used throughout the clip to give focus to certain points within the frame. As it is a night-time party, there isn't any natural light. So artificial lighting such as spot lights have been used to give focus to the most important parts in each scene. This is effective as we can still tell that it is night as there are parts within each scene that are clearly dark, however we can clearly see what is going on and are given a point to focus on through the use of spot-lighting.

Here the lighting has almost produced a vignette around Michelle which is surrounding and framing her, showing that she is the main focus

Here the light is focused between these two people's faces so that our eyes are directed at the kiss

The only subject that we can clearly see here is Tony due to the light that has been projected on him. This keeps us focused on him rather than the dark background.
We can clearly tell here that a light is being projected on him because we can clearly see the dark shadow behind that his figure is making

The lighting here focuses on the people in the foreground and the NOS they are inhaling, showing us what exactly is going on at this party and symbolising as fun to us as the audience

The lighting is focusing on Cassie in the foreground and her actions/emotions which are likely to have been caused by the consumption of drugs

There is a flash of light where the whole scene is illuminated, this is to symbolise the high-point of the party

After the flash of light, there are quite a few dark scenes where not much is visible to symbolise that the party can only go downhill from here and what is happening is actually pretty dark and awful

The scenes after have a lot more darkness and shadow to them, hinting to the darkness of the night and the teens actions as time goes on.
Compared to the earlier kissing scene, we are not shown as clearly who these two people are, suggesting that maybe they don't know who they are due to drugs etc, and there is much more shadowing across their faces to show the dark reality of what they are doing.

Props: that are used here such as a child's tricycle, water guns, foam, 3D glasses, drugs, bear costume, glow sticks, squirty cream and make-up, enhance the excitement of the party as these are all things that you symbolise with fun.
A lot of child's toys are used in the clip. Childhood and child's toys are something that we generally associate with a carefree time full of fun, the use of these props helps to show the child-like fun which we expect these characters are having and to also portray them as children themselves. By subtly making them seem like children, it is portraying them as immature, silly and stupid.

Costumes: are very minimal, in the sense that everyone is hardly wearing anything! Most of the cast are in little more than their underwear which appeals to us as the audience seeing someone attractive being quite revealing and we want to continue to watch.
It also portrays the teens quite negatively as people who do what they want and don't care what people think of them, possibly disrespectful whores or sex maniacs.

Location: of the trailer is someone's typical house with photos on the wall that become slanted, vases that become smashed, sofas that become pulled apart and thrown, baths that get laid in, beds that get jumped on and toilets that people throw up into. This setting is one that we can relate to as we see something very similar everyday in our own houses, which gives a connection between us and the cast, making us feel they understand us and we have a connection with them; we want to watch on.
Of corse the obvious use of the house is to symbolise that it is a house party!
The fact that we see so many things being destroyed shows the teens as having a lack of respect with no care, being violent, dangerous and off their heads - this is not something we would typically expect people to do. We can also sympathise with the person who is having their house destroyed, as having one of our own, we wouldn't want that to happen to it!

How does piracy affect Working Title and how have they tried to stop it?

How does piracy damage the film industry?

   If people view or purchase pirated copies of a film, they are not making trips to the cinema, they are not purchasing official DVDs and so film producers and cinemas lose potential money.

   Most films are not big-budget Hollywood films and they cannot afford to lose money from their smaller profit from piracy. If we continue to pirate these low-budget films which target certain niche audiences and encourage people to express individuality, then soon there will be a decrease in the amount of films that can be made as they will not be able to make a profit from it! This means that we will only be able to watch these big budget films and we will not have the chance to watch these unique films that we may love. Meaning it is us who are loosing out from pirating!

What percentage of the population pirate films?

   In 2009 32% of the population pirated films and the percentage is increasing roughly 3% each year. That year 77.75 million pirated DVDs were sold and there was 278 million lost revenue.

Why do you think piracy is increasing?

   Mainly, advances in technology. People have become more comfortable with using the internet to distribute and to download or watch pirated films. Broadband speed has also increased, making it easier for people to watch high quality movies at the click of a button. 

   Technological software such as DVD burners have also become cheaper and more readily available, so that people who pirate films can burn many at one time in high quality.

   

How is the film industry attempting to stop piracy?

   Educational visits to schools etc have been set up to inform people of the affects that piracy has in the hope that the next generation will be more aware and refrain from purchasing pirated films.

   There are also adverts in cinemas and at the beginning of DVDs to thank people for not pirating the film and inform them that piracy is stealing.

If you buy the official DVD you are guaranteed a certain quality, whereas if you download it or purchase a pirate copy you are unsure as to what the quality will be like and it is likely that it will not be anywhere near as good as the original.
   Unlike DVDs, Blu-ray discs are really difficult to copy being such a high quality, and the discs themselves are more expensive to copy onto. By releasing these more advanced, high-quality discs which the public know will not be replicated the same by anyone else, they are more likely to purchase the official Blu-ray disc online or in store.
   Although you can view your film in high quality Blu-ray, watching it on the big screen in the cinema with surround sound and possibly even 3D effects is still going to be better quality and much cheaper than purchasing all the necessary software and equipment yourself! This means that people are more likely to go to the cinema for the real experience of the film, rather than watching a low quality image with a grungy noise coming from their computer at home, as the day to day distractions such as the telephone or children disturb their experience.
   Another way to persuade you to purchase the original copy is to offer you 'triple play'. This means that you have a standard DVD as not everyone has upgraded to Blu-ray, but you have the Blu-ray disc there for future use, and you also have a copy that you can download to your computer and put straight onto your phone or iPod so that you can watch the movie when you're out and about. This stops people ripping films off websites such as pirate bay for this easy access reason.

   Working Title Films are part of NBC universal who had previous existing business links with Apple and so came together so that their films could be distributed via the Apple iStore. This means that people can purchase a digital copy of films such as Atonement and Paul.

   People often pirate films so that they can watch them immediately. They do not have to wait for the DVD they ordered to arrive in the post and then wait until the weekend again when they aren't working to be able to watch it, they can simply do it there and then - it fits into people's current busy lifestyles. By allowing them to purchase or rent a digital copy of the film they desire to watch which they can instantly stream to their iPod/TV etc, in high quality, means that people are less likely to go for the option of pirating the film.

   Giving people the opportunity to rent the film means that they do not have to pay a high price when they know that they will only watch the film once. But a profit is still made apposed to when people pirate the film – this alternative is fair for everyone.

   Working title films are also available for rental using Love Film - which sends the films you request to your door and lets you post them back for free with no late fees! All of these new methods of allowing people to view a certain film have been based on what the consumer wants - which is being able to watch the film when and where they want, so that they can fit it into their busy lifestyles.

Are there any positives to piracy?
   Although piracy is wrong, it has caused some benefits to us as the consumer. We no longer have to part with £15 for a DVD, prices have come down considerably due to competition between online stores and with piracy on the rise, they want to make sure that the films are affordable so that people will purchase them.
   It has caused film distributors to look at our individual needs, and we can now purchase films offline or get triple play DVD versions so that we can watch the film whenever it is convenient to us.
   Piracy may also have increased the amount of people who are aware and interested in the film. If someone watches a pirated movie and recommends it to all their friends, then their friends will likely talk about it and may go out to purchase it. Even the person who pirated the movie in the first place may decide to buy a better quality version of the film after watching it and liking it!

Representation of age in Monarch of the Glen, focus on mise-en-scene

In the first image we are shown, we see a group of older people wearing sensible clothing, carrying big tools and coming together to work on a project.

This is a great contrast to the younger people who are then shown in much brighter 'wilder' clothing, with casual jeans compared to the smarter clothing worn by the older generation. The boy is wearing a hoodie which people stereotypically associate with naughty teenagers or thugs, and our view of respect for these young people is not as high as the older people we have seen previously.

The way in which Amy clumsily catches the car keys, portrays her lack of experience in the driving department. This prop is used to display her lack of knowledge and portray her as a young girl.

Amy wears blue eye shadow, jewelry and has her hair tied up in a ponytail which is quite child-like. All of these aspects of her costume portray her to be young and care-free, also hinting towards the fact that she takes pride in her appearance and she does not focus as much on things that the older generation do such as helping out the community. Her hair is styled to be almost 'school girl' like, which I feel is to help us easily accept that she is still at school which we find out later in the clip.

Showing the car crash shows Amy's lack of experience with driving, her immaturity to think she could get away with it and the trouble that she continues to cause her family. 

Amy's reaction here is very child-like as she says 'I hate you!' just as you may expect a child to say when they do not get their own way. This view of Amy really helps us to see how immature she is.

We then see her proceed to run off to her room in a strop. Again, we expect this from a young child or possibly a moody teenager who does bot have much respect for their elders

Summarise how audiences and institutions have changed since the early 1990's

   In the early 90's the internet was used for audiences such as ourselves, common people to obtain information. This was a one way system - people who owned the websites distributed content and we either engaged in it or we didn't.
   But now there is a new version of the web - web 2.0. We are now able to use websites such as Facebook, YouTube and Wikipedia to distribute our own content and we can do this very easily. This has allowed people to voice their own opinions on content and this in turn means that the producers can change their sites in a way which appeals to us. In a way, this makes us the producers as we are now in control!

Kat and Alfie Trailer East Enders

The trailer starts with an establishing shot, showing us the location in which the show will take place and giving us a current view of what the pub looks like so that we are aware of the recent fire that has made the pub inhabitable.

The camera angle here is slanted, along with the sign which appears to have fallen. This suggests that the town itself has become rundown, broken and dysfunctional and that things will continue to go wrong.

A tracking shot is used to show Kat walking, giving the effect that everyone is watching her. Her boots and the loud noise they make when she walks also helps to draw attention to what she is doing.

This over the shoulder shot shows us the fear this character has for Kat, as she is right at the side of the shot, almost trying to hide away, and due to the blinds she hides behind, we can tell that she does not want to be seen by her. 

Although we can tell who she is looking at, we are still not shown Kat which builds up suspense as we wait to find out who this character is. 

A tilt shot is then used, as the camera travels from Kat's feet...

To her face. This happens fairly slowly and really builds up our suspense to find out exactly who the character is. It also allows us to focus on each part of her at a time- i.e. what she is wearing, we see her boots, wonder who would be wearing them and why, we then notice her short skirt, bracelets, poncho, big gold earrings and start to build up the image and personality of this character.

This over the shoulder shot shows the intimidation which Kat possesses. We see her as a dark figure and the characters looking at her with shock and dread.

This close up shot is used to really define the fear and intrigue of the characters as we can very clearly see the expression on their faces from this close up. They are obviously shocked to see her, and we can tell this character's fear from the way in which he hides behind the blind. But the fact he is still looking at her shows he is intrigued as to why she is here. 

This shot focuses us on Kat's actions. With the typical Western scene that is represented here, we expect her to be reaching for a gun and this wonder builds our own personal fear of this character.

We then have a macro shot, where once again we are shown the pub, giving us a clear reminder of the location. We also get to see the reaction of characters which have noticed her from a distance.

An over-the-shoulder shot is used here to clearly show the audience that Kat has noticed Alfie. This is the first time in the extract which we see a character that is not intimidated or feared by Kat. In the previous over the shoulder shot, Kat is portrayed as a very dark and mysterious figure, but when the same shot is used again here, the dark character personality and main focus of the shot has switched to the almost silhouette figure in Kat's view - showing this character also has a high status in the plot of the story.

This shot of looking through Kat's legs, in one which you would typically expect to see in a Western film to portray that both characters are directly facing each other, legs apart, bold and ready for a duel.

We then switch from a close-up shot of Alfie...

To one of Kat. This gives us a close and clear view of the character's expressions and